UAP Advisory Board Urged to Focus on Evidence, Not Aliens
6 reported
A commentary on the UAP Scientific Advisory Board suggests the group should prioritize data-driven questions over speculation about aliens. The author warns that more frauds, charlatans, and lunatics are entering the field of inquiry. The piece argues the board should focus on confirming whether released and unreleased videos are backed by radar, satellite, eyewitness, and other forms of evidence. It emphasizes that "confirming" means verifying the phenomena are real, not confirming they are aliens. The author states that if the phenomena are confirmed as real, the debate can then return to what they might be. The commentary concludes that focusing on concrete evidence is something a committee can be relatively good at, while trying to find agreement on aliens does not fall into that category.
What’s reported
The author states there are more frauds, charlatans, and lunatics entering the area of UAP inquiry.
The piece recommends staying disciplined on data-driven questions, specifically whether videos are backed by radar, satellite, eyewitness, and other confirming evidence.
"Confirming" is defined as verifying the phenomena are real, not confirming they are aliens.
The author suggests not focusing the discourse on aliens, but on whether the phenomena are real.
If confirmed as real, the author says the debate can return to what the phenomena might be.
The commentary states that focusing on concrete evidence is something a committee can be relatively good at.
Sources: marginalrevolution.com
