Study questions reliability of body language for lie detection in courts
A commentary by a University College London lecturer argues that using body language and demeanour to detect deception is unreliable, citing examples from the UK judicial system. The author, Kirsty King, notes that judicial directions in Scotland advise jurors to consider witnesses’ body language, while in England and Wales jurors are told not to take so many notes that they cannot observe witnesses’ manner. King states that research shows common body-language cues, such as avoiding eye contact or eye direction, lack scientific basis. She argues that lying is primarily a linguistic act and that language reveals deception through word choice, grammar, and sentence structure. The article references a 1994 English jury that consulted a Ouija board during a murder trial, which King compares to relying on body language assessments. King concludes that if courts continue to encourage judgments based on body language rather than speech content, they may as well allow supernatural consultations.
What’s reported
Key figures
Sources: The Guardian
